From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgsql: Generate backup manifests for base backups, and validate them. |
Date: | 2020-04-07 16:44:26 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYj0p97agO34-WGVCx3RrAHEcsXf01cvr4YH_vg5x2w2g@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Apr 7, 2020 at 5:51 AM Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 2020-04-03 21:07, Robert Haas wrote:
> > A new tool called pg_validatebackup can validate a backup against the
> > manifest.
>
> In software engineering, "verify" and "validate" have standardized
> distinct meanings. I'm not going to try to explain them here, but you
> can easily find them online. I haven't formed an opinion on which one
> of them this tool is doing, but I notice that both the man page and the
> messages produced by the tool use the two terms seemingly
> interchangeably. We should try to pick the correct term and use it
> consistently.
The tool is trying to make sure that we have the same backup that
we're supposed to have, and that the associated WAL is present and
sane. Looking at
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Verification_and_validation, that sounds
more like verification than validation, but I confess that this
distinction is new to me.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tomas Vondra | 2020-04-07 16:50:08 | pgsql: Minor improvements in Incremental Sort explain |
Previous Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-04-07 16:38:02 | Re: pgsql: Prevent archive recovery from scanning non-existent WAL files. |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Fujii Masao | 2020-04-07 16:49:27 | Re: Don't try fetching future segment of a TLI. |
Previous Message | Asif Rehman | 2020-04-07 16:43:51 | Re: WIP/PoC for parallel backup |