From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnakangas(at)vmware(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Sequence Access Method WIP |
Date: | 2014-11-08 15:46:26 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYiKUG335uw3B6ZhUgacszz6OorC3M56E7j-icZ6-Vc5Q@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sat, Nov 8, 2014 at 6:17 AM, Petr Jelinek <petr(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> Honestly, I am still not convinced that the centralized sequence server with
> no local caching is something we should be optimizing for as that one will
> suffer from performance problems anyway. And it can ignore the last_value
> input from postgres if it choses to, so it's not like the currently proposed
> patch forbids implementation of such AMs.
I can buy that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2014-11-08 16:24:39 | Re: row_to_json bug with index only scans: empty keys! |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2014-11-08 15:42:15 | Re: Add CREATE support to event triggers |