Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Rowley <david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ATTACH/DETACH PARTITION CONCURRENTLY
Date: 2019-03-14 16:01:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYi+vOokjC_92vUdA7uVKULLcHgZY_2b_uz-HyjsudYWQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Mar 14, 2019 at 6:12 AM David Rowley
<david(dot)rowley(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On Wed, 6 Mar 2019 at 10:13, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> > Would anyone like to argue that there is any other reason not to
> > commit these patches?
>
> Hi Robert,
>
> Thanks for working on this. I'm sorry I didn't get a chance to
> dedicate some time to look at it.
>
> It looks like you've pushed all of this now. Can the CF entry be
> marked as committed?

Yeah, done now, thanks.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-03-14 16:02:10 Re: why doesn't DestroyPartitionDirectory hash_destroy?
Previous Message Michael Banck 2019-03-14 15:54:34 Re: Offline enabling/disabling of data checksums