Re: pgsql: Improve pg_check_dir code and comments.

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: pgsql-committers <pgsql-committers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pgsql: Improve pg_check_dir code and comments.
Date: 2015-02-17 15:49:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYh_LMqA6WnLRJb9+iC9hmMaYvA3KOD_iXrkeMT-8MKfg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-committers

On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas <rhaas(at)postgresql(dot)org> writes:
>> Improve pg_check_dir code and comments.
>> Avoid losing errno if readdir() fails and closedir() works. Consistently
>> return 4 rather than 3 if both a lost+found directory and other files are
>> found, rather than returning one value or the other depending on the
>> order of the directory listing. Update comments to match the actual
>> behavior.
>
>> These oversights date to commits 6f03927fce038096f53ca67eeab9adb24938f8a6
>> and 17f15239325a88581bb4f9cf91d38005f1f52d69.
>
> In that case, doesn't this need to be back-patched?
>
> In addition to the problems you cite, the previous coding appears to fail
> to close the directory handle if readdir() fails, which is certainly a
> significant enough bug to merit back-patching.

OK, I'll work on that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-committers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-02-17 15:57:17 pgsql: Improve pg_check_dir code and comments.
Previous Message Tom Lane 2015-02-17 15:45:24 Re: pgsql: Improve pg_check_dir code and comments.