From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
Cc: | Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: ATT_FOREIGN_TABLE and ATWrongRelkindError() |
Date: | 2015-10-28 11:31:19 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYgKzeOqvR5+JhzdWJYMU2CEXBySRcTogrvupxxJadjgA@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Oct 26, 2015 at 3:12 AM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2015/10/23 19:02, Amit Langote wrote:
>> On 2015/10/23 18:51, Etsuro Fujita wrote:
>>>
>>> This is really really nitpicking, but I noticed that there is an implicit
>>> rule concerning the message format in ATWrongRelkindError; if more than
>>> two objects are present, the message is "\"%s\" is not a foo, bar, or
>>> baz". ("or" is preceded by a comma!) So, would it be better that the
>>> former is "\"%s\" is not a table, view, or foreign table"?
>>
>> Oops! Yeah, I missed the comma there. That seems like a generally
>> preferred punctuation rule (the comma before conjunction(s) I mean).
>
> Here is a patch rectifying that mistake.
Committed.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-28 11:37:50 | Re: pgbench gaussian/exponential docs improvements |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-10-28 11:20:22 | Re: Add EXTRA_CFLAGS to configure |