From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | "Andrey M(dot) Borodin" <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, MBeena Emerson <mbeena(dot)emerson(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> |
Subject: | Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." |
Date: | 2020-08-05 19:34:00 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYgFf35DEmJ6OyetoW0h8qxmCTtOfrB3tgjqq5htK=V1A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 12:13 PM Ashutosh Sharma <ashu(dot)coek88(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> If the above path is taken that means none of the items in the page
> got changed.
Oops. I didn't realize that, sorry. Maybe it would be a little more
clear if instead of "int nSkippedItems" you had "bool
did_modify_page"? Then you could initialize it to false and set it to
true just before doing the page modifications.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2020-08-05 19:58:56 | Re: recovering from "found xmin ... from before relfrozenxid ..." |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2020-08-05 18:21:59 | Re: FailedAssertion("pd_idx == pinfo->nparts", File: "execPartition.c", Line: 1689) |