From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
Cc: | pgsql-docs <pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: bgworker / SPI docs patches |
Date: | 2015-07-29 15:35:31 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYe3-XHazbJf6wc7Bwjtoo-_UGkh=d6p1FJh0mCRrmEMg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-docs |
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:29 AM, Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> After spending a while working on the BDR extension I've found that the
> current documentation on the SPI and bgworkers could use some more detail.
>
> In the process I've put cross reference labels in for most chapter headings,
> as I got sick of seeing "Chapter 33" (or whatever) everywhere in the docs.
> I'd like to progressively add them to every section, refentry, chapter, etc
> that has an id.
>
> I hope this is useful.
Per Peter, 0001 is not wanted. I tend to agree with him on that point
of style. Patch 0002 makes the docs build fail unless 0001 is applied
first, so I can't pursue that unless you want to revise that
accordingly. I've committed 0003, and will look at 0004 next.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-07-29 16:50:15 | Re: bgworker / SPI docs patches |
Previous Message | Mehmet Emin KARAKAŞ | 2015-07-29 09:21:43 | Wrong Typo |