Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com>
Cc: Craig Ringer <craig(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Ian Barwick <ian(dot)barwick(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: let's make the list of reportable GUCs configurable (was Re: Add %r substitution for psql prompts to show recovery status)
Date: 2019-07-10 13:11:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYbfXtKBni1CEX4e32RF+BTj47h4amYhD_4iXbxemH2yw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 9, 2019 at 2:32 PM Dave Cramer <pg(at)fastcrypt(dot)com> wrote:
> So did this die from lack of interest?
>
> I have proposed in another thread adding more GUC REPORT variables, but I see this as a much better way.
>
> I'm willing to code the patch if we can get some buy in here ?

It seemed like most people at least didn't hate the idea completely,
and some liked it, so I think it would be worth revisiting. If you
decide to write a patch, I'll try to help review.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-07-10 13:23:19 Re: progress report for ANALYZE
Previous Message Jesper Pedersen 2019-07-10 13:10:36 Re: Index Skip Scan