From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> |
Cc: | Gurjeet Singh <singh(dot)gurjeet(at)gmail(dot)com>, PGSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade |
Date: | 2011-07-20 20:02:56 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYaeb6JL6DjOpHkAOXhOQyC9qoz5VVrU+4-1DNDG24PSw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-general pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 3:29 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
>> >> I am assuming that's a "yes" to both the directions: older -> newer , and
>> >> newer -> older minor releases.
>> >
>> > Yes, I believe both directions would work unless we mentioned it the
>> > release notes, in which cases it might not work, or might work older to
>> > newer but newer to older.
>>
>> I don't see how this would get broken in a minor release. We'd have
>> to change the WAL format or the tuple format, which is definitely not
>> minor release material.
>
> If there was a bug in the xlog stream content we might not be able to
> fix it without breaking compatibility. Rare, but possible.
OK, fair enough. But I think the likelihood is extremely low.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-07-20 20:47:50 | Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade |
Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2011-07-20 19:29:07 | Re: A few user-level questions on Streaming Replication and pg_upgrade |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2011-07-20 20:06:33 | Re: Another issue with invalid XML values |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2011-07-20 19:33:56 | Re: WIP fix proposal for bug #6123 |