| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andrey Borodin <x4mmm(at)yandex-team(dot)ru>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Michael Banck <michael(dot)banck(at)credativ(dot)de>, Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Online enabling of checksums |
| Date: | 2018-04-06 22:58:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYaVXVvXYFVYiBh_vJdRTvFakyqA3W3GFHDEP2ELJVeBw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Apr 6, 2018 at 6:56 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> no one can entirely quibble with the rationale that this is ok (I'll
> post a patch cleaning up the atomics simulation of flags in a bit), but
> this is certainly not a correct locking strategy.
I think we have enough evidence at this point to conclude that this
patch, along with MERGE, should be reverted.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jonathan S. Katz | 2018-04-06 22:59:09 | Re: PostgreSQL 11 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2018-04-06 22:57:36 | Re: PostgreSQL 11 Release Management Team & Feature Freeze |