From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
Cc: | Abhijit Menon-Sen <ams(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Haribabu Kommi <kommi(dot)haribabu(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thom Brown <thom(at)linux(dot)com>, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions |
Date: | 2016-04-21 18:11:39 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYaGBfeTgbv87sNNM3sgtSp6XhVJZ_fCYShu7eFucVwiQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 9:45 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> My attempts to test things were also singularly unrewarding. Even
>> after messing with the filesystem in various ways, I couldn't figure
>> out exactly how this makes a difference.
>
> What do you mean by this? You couldn't reproduce the bug? Or not how to
> trigger such a test?
Let's see. I think what i did is made _mdfd_getseg() error out if it
got to a segment that was not the right size and preceded the one it
was trying to reach. But I could not hit that error.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | David G. Johnston | 2016-04-21 21:01:49 | Re: BUG #14107: Major query planner bug regarding subqueries and indices |
Previous Message | Andres Freund | 2016-04-21 13:45:05 | Re: [BUGS] Breakage with VACUUM ANALYSE + partitions |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-21 18:15:53 | Re: kqueue |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2016-04-21 18:07:41 | Re: max_parallel_degree > 0 for 9.6 beta |