| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, Greg Sabino Mullane <htamfids(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Christofides <michael(at)pgmustard(dot)com>, "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Nikolay Samokhvalov <samokhvalov(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Proposals for EXPLAIN: rename ANALYZE to EXECUTE and extend VERBOSE |
| Date: | 2024-11-25 20:44:38 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYa4C+-ooKxCQ2dkqMucysrMsc2OXNV2Pd8vTLmSXf75w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Nov 20, 2024 at 4:23 PM David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Nov 2024 at 08:30, Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info> wrote:
> > OK, I'm fine with this. v4 patch attached with one plan showing read, written, and dirtied buffers.
>
> I think this might be a good time for anyone out there who is against
> turning on BUFFERS when ANALYZE is on to speak up.
>
> Votes for changing this so far seem to be: Me, Michael Christofides,
> Guillaume Lelarge, Robert, Greg Sabino Mullane, and David Fetter (from
> 2020) [1].
>
> Votes against: None
Just to be clear, my vote is more like +0 than +1. I recognize that
changing this is popular and I'm not opposed to it, but I'm also not
unhappy with things as they are.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Devulapalli, Raghuveer | 2024-11-25 20:54:48 | RE: Proposal for Updating CRC32C with AVX-512 Algorithm. |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2024-11-25 20:44:00 | Re: Planner picks n² query plan when available |