| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Greg Stark <stark(at)mit(dot)edu>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: alter table only ... drop constraint broken in HEAD |
| Date: | 2011-10-10 03:48:43 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYa2jLbaJ13fTC0KyacacPdpT0AR_UMAQ55gz0a=vCJ+g@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Sun, Oct 9, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Alex Hunsaker <badalex(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> So i just picked up the non-inherited constraints patch and quickly
>> ran into the same problem and found this thread.
>>
>> I think it makes sense to hold off on this patch until these issues
>> are resolved. Because we really do need to test the cases when adding
>> or removing child tables that have constraints with the same name as
>> non-inherited parent tables. And I'm not sure what will happen in
>> these cases once these issues are resolved.
>
> Doesn't someone just need to commit Roberts patch?
Yeah, I've just been mostly AFK for ~53 hours. It's committed now.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-10-10 04:09:13 | Re: SET variable - Permission issues |
| Previous Message | Alex Goncharov | 2011-10-10 02:39:17 | Re: What is known about PostgreSQL HP-UX support? |