From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
Cc: | Dave Page <dpage(at)pgadmin(dot)org>, Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: The purpose of the core team |
Date: | 2015-06-11 16:49:39 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYa+1cFaxGOMox5MgFhaL1N3NGNRE1WWLW-4JMpyiSHBQ@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 12:13 PM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> This is crap. I am on the packagers list. Core always asks what people think
> and no it is not always accepted. There have been many times that the
> release has been pushed off because of resources available or new
> information being provided. There have also been plenty of well worn FOSS
> arguments on that list to make sure that everything is done in a mature,
> reliable and professional way.
I think I've gotten sucked into arguing about something I don't really
want to argue about. I agree that -core is always very polite when
they asked on -packagers, and that -core would probably move the
release date if subscribers to -packagers asked them so to do. I also
do not dispute Dave's statement that PostgreSQL's packagers are very
committed. That is certainly true. From what I can see they bend
over backwards to get the job done, which is great.
Now, I cannot personally recall, nor find in my email archives, an
occasion on which -packagers asked for the release date to be moved.
But you or others may be able to, and that is fine, but it's not what
I'm unhappy about.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Andrew Dunstan | 2015-06-11 16:49:48 | Re: The purpose of the core team |
Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2015-06-11 16:29:07 | Re: The purpose of the core team |