Re: Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Kuntal Ghosh <kuntalghosh(dot)2007(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Implementing pg_receivewal --no-sync
Date: 2017-10-29 07:31:12
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYWjEqeXJqpnnqo0amsTTU8gzuebYkjZQ90UaJF03oO+Q@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 29, 2017 at 3:42 AM, Michael Paquier
<michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Okay. Here is an updated patch incorporating those comments.

Committed with a little wordsmithing on the documentation.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-10-29 07:45:52 Re: Parallel worker error
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-10-29 07:08:28 Re: [POC] hash partitioning