| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Date: | 2015-08-27 21:11:48 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYW7shJt1m6wgbJDfCmr9BX4Z1f+PsLwwkjqLD2AFz==w@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Aug 27, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> That's not yet perfect, but shows what I'm thinking of. Comments?
>
> Needs a bit of copy-editing in places, but +1 overall.
Yeah. I bet there's a lot more useful stuff we could include also,
but everything Andres mentioned is certainly good to put in there.
Alternatively, some of this stuff could go into a README file instead
of the documentation, but I think we've been leaning toward
documenting more C stuff lately, and I'm fine with that.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-08-27 21:25:17 | Re: Raising our compiler requirements for 9.6 |
| Previous Message | Qingqing Zhou | 2015-08-27 20:01:46 | Re: Our trial to TPC-DS but optimizer made unreasonable plan |