| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items |
| Date: | 2015-05-14 22:28:32 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYVpa2WJ_QP5qEvtgjvc0MenxnZVch+cjXzq+_3vzferQ@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 6:03 PM, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com> wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2015 at 2:28 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> On 2015-05-14 17:10:29 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> FWIW, I did go look at this patch, and concluded it was not close enough
>>> to ready to try to squeeze it in now. (I think Andres isn't convinced
>>> of that yet, but time grows short, and I quite agree with Robert that
>>> committing almost-ready patches at this stage of the game is a bad idea.)
>>
>> I think if there's any patch that deserves some leeway it's this
>> one. It's been been forced into a limbo for nearly half a year; without
>> leaving Andrew many options.
>
> +1.
>
> If Andres is going to try and find a way of getting the patch into
> 9.5, then I think he deserves at least a few extra days. It wasn't as
> if Andrew wasn't all over this from early in the cycle.
+1.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2015-05-14 22:48:24 | Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2015-05-14 22:28:13 | Re: Triaging the remaining open commitfest items |