From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> |
Cc: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: New WAL record to detect the checkpoint redo location |
Date: | 2023-10-18 14:24:50 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYV0+U94mU2O2agx03AVzmK81w7uv98_6N5ciguc3VF-A@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 8:35 PM Michael Paquier <michael(at)paquier(dot)xyz> wrote:
> Suggestion is from here, with a test for pg_walinspect after it runs
> its online checkpoint (see the full-page case):
> https://www.postgresql.org/message-id/ZOvf1tu6rfL/B2PW(at)paquier(dot)xyz
>
> +-- Check presence of REDO record.
> +SELECT redo_lsn FROM pg_control_checkpoint() \gset
> +SELECT start_lsn = :'redo_lsn'::pg_lsn AS same_lsn, record_type
> + FROM pg_get_wal_record_info(:'redo_lsn');
I added a variant of this test case. Here's v10.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
---|---|---|
v10-0001-During-online-checkpoints-insert-XLOG_CHECKPOINT.patch | application/octet-stream | 18.6 KB |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2023-10-18 14:27:59 | Re: Query execution in Perl TAP tests needs work |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-10-18 14:07:46 | Re: run pgindent on a regular basis / scripted manner |