| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Matthias van de Meent <boekewurm+postgres(at)gmail(dot)com>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alexander Lakhin <exclusion(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-bugs(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Subject: | Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae |
| Date: | 2024-03-30 17:35:54 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYUnV-RYzn00jF2irua29mdb0vqgH-LjPHiSJZG_tUQVg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
On Sat, Mar 30, 2024 at 12:19 PM Melanie Plageman
<melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Obviously we should actually fix this on back branches, but could we
> at least make the retry loop interruptible in some way so people could
> use pg_cancel/terminate_backend() on a stuck autovacuum worker or
> vacuum process?
Yeah, as long as that's not the only thing we do.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | walther | 2024-03-31 13:34:23 | Re: Building with musl in CI and the build farm |
| Previous Message | Melanie Plageman | 2024-03-30 16:19:33 | Re: relfrozenxid may disagree with row XIDs after 1ccc1e05ae |