Re: pg_xlogfile_name_offset() et al and recovery

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_xlogfile_name_offset() et al and recovery
Date: 2016-07-08 01:43:53
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYU1kCq421fLycv8hvh1OgaOs=f3VT2QoWCkAjGH1UjrA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 5:26 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The behaviour of that function is defined in backbranches, so I suggest we
> should not alter that now.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Simon Riggs 2016-07-08 01:53:53 Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-07-08 01:41:52 Re: A Modest Upgrade Proposal