| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Ants Aasma <ants(dot)aasma(at)eesti(dot)ee>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: JIT compiling - v4.0 |
| Date: | 2017-10-06 01:47:52 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYTyGqrusrQGZ6fzjO3zj0hFibhuarvNcsYNvgg77ao1A@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 5, 2017 at 2:57 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
> master q01 min: 14146.498 dev min: 11479.05 [diff -23.24] dev-jit min: 8659.961 [diff -63.36] dev-jit-deform min: 7279.395 [diff -94.34] dev-jit-deform-inline min: 6997.956 [diff -102.15]
I think this is a really strange way to display this information.
Instead of computing the percentage of time that you saved, you've
computed the negative of the percentage that you would have lost if
the patch were already committed and you reverted it. That's just
confusing.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2017-10-06 01:59:41 | Re: v10 bottom-listed |
| Previous Message | Amit Langote | 2017-10-06 01:29:31 | Re: Optimise default partition scanning while adding new partition |