Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us>
Cc: "David G(dot) Johnston" <david(dot)g(dot)johnston(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: doc: Clarify what "excluded" represents for INSERT ON CONFLICT
Date: 2022-07-11 16:25:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYSnrtYDpzw+vVgPh9Cj6KWSJyH3vTTJO8n7iYn2ZerDQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jul 8, 2022 at 11:18 PM Bruce Momjian <bruce(at)momjian(dot)us> wrote:
> I found two places where a singular "row" would be better, doc patch
> attached.

+1.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2022-07-11 16:31:38 annoyance with .git-blame-ignore-revs
Previous Message Robert Haas 2022-07-11 16:19:31 Re: making relfilenodes 56 bits