Re: parallel query vs extensions

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: parallel query vs extensions
Date: 2016-04-18 13:56:28
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYRi8F_p6x-XbE57JgEmMSmu68vckV4cpZ35G4HmkmazQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Apr 15, 2016 at 12:45 AM, Jeff Janes <jeff(dot)janes(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Should every relevant contrib extension get a version bump with a
> transition file which is nothing but a list of "alter function blah
> blah blah parallel safe" ?

Yes, I think that's what we would need to do. It's a lot of work,
albeit mostly mechanical.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Kevin Grittner 2016-04-18 14:03:13 Re: snapshot too old, configured by time
Previous Message Tom Lane 2016-04-18 13:50:31 Re: snapshot too old, configured by time