From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: pgbench stats per script & other stuff |
Date: | 2015-07-21 16:19:23 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYQi7sPG+b_19Y4bn2wUPUujsSZ_qOF8nWZTrC1Pbqivg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Jul 21, 2015 at 10:42 AM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>>> sh> ./pgbench -T 3 -B -N -w 2 -S -w 7 --per-script-stats
>>
>> That is a truly horrifying abuse of command-line arguments. -1 from
>> me, or minus more than one if I've got that many chits to burn.
>
> Are you against the -w, or against saying that pgbench execute scripts,
> whether internal or from files?
I'm against the idea that we accept multiple arguments for scripts,
and that a subsequent -w modifies the meaning of the
script-specifiying argument already read. That strikes me as a very
unintuitive interface. I'm not sure exactly what would be better at
the moment, but I think we need something better.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2015-07-21 16:20:12 | Re: Fillfactor for GIN indexes |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-07-21 16:12:32 | Re: TABLESAMPLE patch is really in pretty sad shape |