From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> |
Cc: | Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Make relfile tombstone files conditional on WAL level |
Date: | 2022-02-07 16:11:53 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYQLMZfPXycF=7WbpCde-R1TDBjrS+Q0qwcKXqV+9z7bw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Feb 7, 2022 at 12:26 AM Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I have splitted the patch into multiple patches which can be
> independently committable and easy to review. I have explained the
> purpose and scope of each patch in the respective commit messages.
Hmm. The parts of this I've looked at seem reasonably clean, but I
don't think I like the design choice. You're inventing
RelFileNodeSetFork(), but at present the RelFileNode struct doesn't
include a fork number. I feel like we should leave that alone, and
only change the definition of a BufferTag. What about adding accessors
for all of the BufferTag fields in 0001, and then in 0002 change it to
look like something this:
typedef struct BufferTag
{
Oid dbOid;
Oid tablespaceOid;
uint32 fileNode_low;
uint32 fileNode_hi:24;
uint32 forkNumber:8;
BlockNumber blockNumber;
} BufferTag;
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joe Conway | 2022-02-07 16:13:04 | Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles |
Previous Message | Julien Rouhaud | 2022-02-07 16:08:14 | Re: Database-level collation version tracking |