Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andrew Dunstan <andrew(dot)dunstan(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] MERGE SQL Statement for PG11
Date: 2018-01-04 17:40:34
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYQGHi01hM0Yv_M7n1hVz8fyU5dBTDZfMHdZjZm_7g0Xw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jan 4, 2018 at 12:38 PM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 4 January 2018 at 17:29, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> On Sat, Dec 30, 2017 at 6:01 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
>>> Patch uses mechanism as agreed previously with Peter G et al. on this thread.
>>
>> I'm not sure that an agreement was reached, or what the substance of
>> that agreement was.
>
> I refer to this... and confirm I have implemented option 3

Thanks. Sorry, I had forgotten about that.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2018-01-04 17:51:53 Re: Announcing Release 6 of PostgreSQL Buildfarm client
Previous Message Robert Haas 2018-01-04 17:39:47 Re: Condition variable live lock