| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> |
| Cc: | Jan Wieck <jan(at)wi3ck(dot)info>, Nils Goroll <slink(at)schokola(dot)de>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: s_lock() seems too aggressive for machines with many sockets |
| Date: | 2015-06-10 19:46:46 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYPS8KPxzYJ4zNFb8V8+b=-1KKS3Pt5bsAVHVarGJ4SUA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 10, 2015 at 1:58 PM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> Now that we (EnterpriseDB) have this 8-socket machine, maybe we could
>> try your patch there, bound to varying numbers of sockets.
>
> It'd be a significant amount of work to rebase it ontop current HEAD. I
> guess the easiest thing would be to try an older version of the patch
> with the xadd in place, and use a tree from back then.
We could do that, I guess. But we've made other significant
improvements in the meantime, so...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Peter Geoghegan | 2015-06-10 20:02:25 | Re: Further issues with jsonb semantics, documentation |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2015-06-10 19:35:10 | Re: jsonb - path |