Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Etsuro Fujita <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>, Amit Langote <amitlangote09(at)gmail(dot)com>, Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh(dot)bapat(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Andreas Seltenreich <seltenreich(at)gmx(dot)de>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: [sqlsmith] Failed assertion in postgres_fdw/deparse.c:1116
Date: 2016-06-17 12:45:08
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYP-3yn6LxziLGAx87m1W+R-p6X3pK65dcARbY8xM+faQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 10:44 PM, Etsuro Fujita
<fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
> On 2016/06/16 22:00, Robert Haas wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 7:05 AM, Etsuro Fujita
>> <fujita(dot)etsuro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>>>
>>> ISTM that a robuster solution to this is to push down the ft1-ft2-ft3
>>> join
>>> with the PHV by extending deparseExplicitTargetList() and/or something
>>> else
>>> so that we can send the remote query like:
>>>
>>> select ft1.a, (ft3.a IS NOT NULL) from (ft1 inner join ft2 on ft1.a =
>>> ft2.a)
>>> left join ft3 on ft1.a = ft3.a
>
>> I completely agree we should have that, but not for 9.6.
>
> OK, I'll work on that for 10.0.

Great, that will be a nice improvement.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Amit Kapila 2016-06-17 13:04:45 Re: ERROR: ORDER/GROUP BY expression not found in targetlist
Previous Message Robert Haas 2016-06-17 12:44:20 Re: MultiXactId error after upgrade to 9.3.4