| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Add checklist item for psql completion to commitfest review |
| Date: | 2017-02-15 15:49:01 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYP=3yzAL4eLFwHywWhpX06FBMc=ino1K42Yj2=FOWJzg@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Tue, Feb 14, 2017 at 1:13 PM, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com> wrote:
> After seeing Yet Another Missing Psql Tab Completion it occurred to me...
> why not add a checklist item to the commitfest review page? I realize most
> regular contributors don't use the form, but a fair number of people do. I
> don't see how it could hurt.
>
> Another possible idea is a git hook that checks to see if the psql
> completion code has been touched if any of the grammar has been. That could
> certainly trigger false positives so it'd need to be easy to over-ride, but
> AFAIK that could be done via a special phrase in the commit message.
In the past, our usual policy has been that tab completion isn't a
hard requirement for a patch implementing a new feature. It often
gets added after the fact. I think that policy has worked fine, but
it's not a bad thing for people to include tab completion in the
original patch either, if they have the brain space for it.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-15 15:52:03 | Re: pg_basebackup -R |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2017-02-15 15:46:54 | Re: Documentation improvements for partitioning |