| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: Replication/backup defaults |
| Date: | 2017-01-10 19:03:59 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYO2RXKro_xnXoHw88B8=abgAoAGqb5qe1Q93t23jE=Ug@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jan 9, 2017 at 11:02 AM, Peter Eisentraut
<peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 1/9/17 7:44 AM, Magnus Hagander wrote:
>> So based on that, I suggest we go ahead and make the change to make both
>> the values 10 by default. And that we do that now, because that lets us
>> get it out through more testing on different platforms, so that we catch
>> issues earlier on if they do arise.
>
> Sounds good.
I may be outvoted, but I'm still not in favor of changing the default
wal_level. That caters only to people who lack sufficient foresight
to know that they need a replica before the system becomes so critical
that they can't bounce it to update the configuration.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2017-01-10 19:08:11 | Re: Add support to COMMENT ON CURRENT DATABASE |
| Previous Message | Pantelis Theodosiou | 2017-01-10 18:55:22 | Re: PoC: Grouped base relation |