Re: Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kerem Kat <keremkat(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Adding CORRESPONDING to Set Operations
Date: 2011-10-19 04:21:42
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYN_=O2PFFRpWb2M-WUKyT+2zUyc5wXUkfV=EjX3AhGYA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 7:46 PM, Kerem Kat <keremkat(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> CORRESPONDING clause take 2

You should probably read this:

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Submitting_a_Patch

And add your patch here:

https://commitfest.postgresql.org/action/commitfest_view/open

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2011-10-19 04:37:17 Re: termination of backend waiting for sync rep generates a junk log message
Previous Message Robert Haas 2011-10-19 04:20:48 Re: pg_ctl restart - behaviour based on wrong instance