Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: New EXPLAIN option: ALL
Date: 2019-05-21 18:03:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYNQHqin3T5_AFvKO7DJRAgy9ROffq0i7XhZa8NW_J_mQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, May 21, 2019 at 1:38 PM David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> wrote:
> Would this be worth back-patching? I ask because adding it will cause
> fairly large (if mechanical) churn in the regression tests.

No. I can't believe you're even asking that question.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2019-05-21 18:10:53 Re: tableam vs. TOAST
Previous Message Fabrízio de Royes Mello 2019-05-21 17:57:25 Re: Re: Refresh Publication takes hours and doesn´t finish