| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Tsunakawa, Takayuki" <tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Yoshimi Ichiyanagi <ichiyanagi(dot)yoshimi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, "menjo(dot)takashi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <menjo(dot)takashi(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "ishizaki(dot)teruaki(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp" <ishizaki(dot)teruaki(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> |
| Subject: | Re: [HACKERS][PATCH] Applying PMDK to WAL operations for persistent memory |
| Date: | 2018-01-26 01:15:10 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYNJi-z9qh5E2KqUmCMi5JNO=AzwYsTVjMDdN52Oak0nw@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jan 25, 2018 at 7:08 PM, Tsunakawa, Takayuki
<tsunakawa(dot)takay(at)jp(dot)fujitsu(dot)com> wrote:
> No, I'm not saying we should make the persistent memory mode the default. I'm simply asking whether it's time to make open_datasync the default setting. We can write a notice in the release note for users who still use ext3 etc. on old systems. If there's no objection, I'll submit a patch for the next CF.
Well, like I said, I think that will degrade performance for users of
SSDs or spinning disks.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Amit Langote | 2018-01-26 01:15:49 | Re: list partition constraint shape |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2018-01-26 01:13:39 | Re: Fix a typo in autoprewarm.c |