| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> |
| Cc: | Jakub Wartak <jakub(dot)wartak(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: trying again to get incremental backup |
| Date: | 2023-12-18 18:27:42 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYN=4z9sp5exBxqQJ5QuVkNE_9KtUYoHCErRyLUr8XPYA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Dec 15, 2023 at 6:53 AM Peter Eisentraut <peter(at)eisentraut(dot)org> wrote:
> The first fixes up some things in nls.mk related to a file move. The
> second is some cleanup because some function you are using has been
> removed in the meantime; you probably found that yourself while rebasing.
Incorporated these. As you guessed,
MemoryContextResetAndDeleteChildren -> MemoryContextReset had already
been done locally.
> The pg_walsummary patch doesn't have a nls.mk, but you also comment that
> it doesn't have tests yet, so I assume it's not considered complete yet
> anyway.
I think this was more of a case of me just not realizing that I should
add that. I'll add something simple to the next version, but I'm not
very good at this NLS stuff.
--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2023-12-18 18:39:33 | Re: trying again to get incremental backup |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2023-12-18 18:18:47 | Re: SLRU optimization - configurable buffer pool and partitioning the SLRU lock |