From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> |
Cc: | Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [PATCH] pgbench --throttle (submission 7 - with lag measurement) |
Date: | 2013-06-21 13:28:37 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYMw6xssTqKhKzS88orXScM+B_hXSf8x_5WcJPdxdnXbw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 2:42 PM, Fabien COELHO <coelho(at)cri(dot)ensmp(dot)fr> wrote:
>> number of transactions actually processed: 301921
> Just a thought before spending too much time on this subtle issue.
>
> The patch worked reasonnably for 301900 transactions in your above run, and
> the few last ones, less than the number of clients, show strange latency
> figures which suggest that something is amiss in some corner case when
> pgbench is stopping. However, the point of pgbench is to test a steady
> state, not to achieve the cleanest stop at the end of a run.
>
> So my question is: should this issue be a blocker wrt to the feature?
I think so. If it doesn't get fixed now, it's not likely to get fixed
later. And the fact that nobody understands why it's happening is
kinda worrisome...
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Erik Rijkers | 2013-06-21 13:39:50 | Re: trgm regex index peculiarity |
Previous Message | MauMau | 2013-06-21 13:27:26 | Re: backend hangs at immediate shutdown (Re: Back-branch update releases coming in a couple weeks) |