Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Adrien Nayrat <adrien(dot)nayrat(at)anayrat(dot)info>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, PostgreSQL mailing lists <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Explain buffers wrong counter with parallel plans
Date: 2018-07-03 11:37:50
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYJwkC0ZoZOAH-02hqbag_ctJ_DeWEGeHfrw3bEtcJyug@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 3, 2018 at 6:48 AM, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> Yeah, previously, I have also pointed out the same code [1]. However,
> I have not done any testing to prove it.

Ah, OK. Sorry, forgot about that email.

> Are you planning to work on it? If not, then I can look into it.

I won't have time for a few weeks, so if you have time sooner please have at it.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Nico Williams 2018-07-03 11:44:34 Re: Threat models for DB cryptography (Re: [Proposal] Table-level Transparent Data Encryption (TDE) and Key) Management Service (KMS)
Previous Message Michael Paquier 2018-07-03 11:31:27 Re: pgsql: Clarify use of temporary tables within partition trees