Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andrew Gierth <andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Andreas Karlsson <andreas(at)proxel(dot)se>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs
Date: 2019-01-28 19:01:21
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYH0kw2EEY5eR9qwk0x94p_=y3PouSuG+BddaLSKWejjw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sun, Jan 27, 2019 at 8:23 AM Andrew Gierth
<andrew(at)tao11(dot)riddles(dot)org(dot)uk> wrote:
> I think it makes more sense to say
> that we never inline if MATERIALIZED is specified, that we always inline
> if NOT MATERIALIZED is specified, and that if neither is specified the
> planner will choose (but perhaps note that currently it always chooses
> only based on refcount).

I, too, like this approach.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message John Naylor 2019-01-28 19:06:49 Re: WIP: Avoid creation of the free space map for small tables
Previous Message Robert Haas 2019-01-28 19:00:33 Re: Early WIP/PoC for inlining CTEs