Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: expanding inheritance in partition bound order
Date: 2017-08-15 17:27:30
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYGjydAva6Knr7LHEijRPw+-Vy5ceBDsELAHXwPQ18JUA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Aug 9, 2017 at 10:11 PM, Amit Langote
<Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp> wrote:
>> P.S. While I haven't reviewed 0002 in detail, I think the concept of
>> minimizing what needs to be built in RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo
>> is a very good idea.
>
> I put this patch ahead in the list and so it's now 0001.

I think what you've currently got as
0003-Relieve-RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo-of-doing-an.patch is a
bug fix that probably needs to be back-patched into v10, so it should
come first.

I think 0002-Teach-pg_inherits.c-a-bit-about-partitioning.patch and
0005-Store-in-pg_inherits-if-a-child-is-a-partitioned-tab.patch should
be merged into one patch and that should come next, followed by
0004-Teach-expand_inherited_rtentry-to-use-partition-boun.patch and
finally what you now have as
0001-Decouple-RelationGetPartitionDispatchInfo-from-execu.patch.

This patch series is blocking a bunch of other things, so it would be
nice if you could press forward with this quickly.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2017-08-15 17:54:04 Re: [PATCH] pageinspect function to decode infomasks
Previous Message Robert Haas 2017-08-15 16:45:11 Re: Partition-wise join for join between (declaratively) partitioned tables