Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)heroku(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)gmail(dot)com>, Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com>, Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Jim Nasby <Jim(dot)Nasby(at)bluetreble(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Anastasia Lubennikova <a(dot)lubennikova(at)postgrespro(dot)ru>
Subject: Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Date: 2017-02-09 19:48:18
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYGUoDocEfQ4o-+M76ngg-3WHKuTtz9eDbz5aQOTpErJw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Thu, Feb 9, 2017 at 3:05 AM, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de> wrote:
>> +#define CHECK_SUPERUSER() { \
>> + if (!superuser()) \
>> + ereport(ERROR, \
>> + (errcode(ERRCODE_INSUFFICIENT_PRIVILEGE), \
>> + (errmsg("must be superuser to use verification functions")))); }
>
> Please make this either a function or just copy - the macro doesn't buy
> us anything except weirder looking syntax.

Better yet, remove the check altogether and just revoke access from
public. Then the default policy is superuser-only, but the DBA can
grant access to who they wish.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andres Freund 2017-02-09 19:53:15 Re: amcheck (B-Tree integrity checking tool)
Previous Message Tom Lane 2017-02-09 19:44:01 Re: [PATCH] Rename pg_switch_xlog to pg_switch_wal