Re: Is Recovery actually paused?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Bharath Rupireddy <bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dilip Kumar <dilipbalaut(at)gmail(dot)com>, Yugo NAGATA <nagata(at)sraoss(dot)co(dot)jp>, Kyotaro Horiguchi <horikyota(dot)ntt(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Is Recovery actually paused?
Date: 2021-01-25 17:00:15
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYG0RKrcyCt_kbmTRFd9r05rv=ZoD59S_c-AzFLt5_N5A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Sat, Jan 23, 2021 at 6:10 AM Bharath Rupireddy
<bharath(dot)rupireddyforpostgres(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> +1 to just show the recovery pause state in the output of
> pg_is_wal_replay_paused. But, should the function name
> "pg_is_wal_replay_paused" be something like
> "pg_get_wal_replay_pause_state" or some other? To me, when "is" exists
> in a function, I expect a boolean output. Others may have better
> thoughts.

Maybe we should leave the existing function pg_is_wal_replay_paused()
alone and add a new one with the name you suggest that returns text.
That would create less burden for tool authors.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message vignesh C 2021-01-25 17:01:54 Re: Identify missing publications from publisher while create/alter subscription.
Previous Message Robert Haas 2021-01-25 16:56:13 cleaning up a few CLOG-related things