Re: alternative compression algorithms?

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tomas Vondra <tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: alternative compression algorithms?
Date: 2015-04-30 11:26:02
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYG-Ah7zYsx10ECajrXBvQhGBRYgR6YgdHWc=nnvzNgMA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Wed, Apr 29, 2015 at 9:12 PM, Tomas Vondra
<tomas(dot)vondra(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> The whole script (doing a lot of estimates) takes 1:50 with pglz and only
> 1:25 with lz4. That's ~25-30% improvement.

Still pretty good....

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2015-04-30 11:33:23 Re: Reducing tuple overhead
Previous Message Sawada Masahiko 2015-04-30 11:07:06 Re: Freeze avoidance of very large table.