Re: broken JIT support on Fedora 40

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Dmitry Dolgov <9erthalion6(at)gmail(dot)com>, Daniel Gustafsson <daniel(at)yesql(dot)se>, Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: broken JIT support on Fedora 40
Date: 2024-05-14 15:09:39
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYFK103Cw6GLVy4P192UsBDQqpm0sqRbscMiftCrt6stg@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Apr 9, 2024 at 8:44 PM Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I pushed the illegal attribute fix though. Thanks for the detective work!

This was commit 53c8d6c9f157f2bc8211b8de02417e55fefddbc7 and as I
understand it that fixed the issue originally reported on this thread.

Therefore, I have marked https://commitfest.postgresql.org/48/4917/ as
Committed.

If that's not correct, please feel free to fix. If there are other
issues that need to be patched separately, please consider opening a
new CF entry for those issues once a patch is available.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Alvaro Herrera 2024-05-14 15:11:53 Re: Dump-restore loosing 'attnotnull' bit for DEFERRABLE PRIMARY KEY column(s).
Previous Message Tom Lane 2024-05-14 15:05:08 Re: elog/ereport VS misleading backtrace_function function address