Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Amit Kapila <amit(dot)kapila16(at)gmail(dot)com>, Thomas Munro <thomas(dot)munro(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Rushabh Lathia <rushabh(dot)lathia(at)gmail(dot)com>, Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>, Corey Huinker <corey(dot)huinker(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [HACKERS] Parallel tuplesort (for parallel B-Tree index creation)
Date: 2018-02-08 12:45:52
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYEH-3zU7KLFjgaPsVg9Jv_bLv_dZFHvUG=Uz8xtDgMtQ@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 3:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 6, 2018 at 2:11 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
>>> Unfortunately valgrind does not work at all on my laptop -- the server
>>> appears to start, but as soon as you try to connect, the whole thing
>>> dies with an error claiming that the startup process has failed. So I
>>> can't easily test this at the moment. I'll try to get it working,
>>> here or elsewhere, but thought I'd send the above reply first.
>>
>> Do you want somebody who does have a working valgrind installation
>> (ie me) to take responsibility for pushing this patch?
>
> I committed it before seeing this. It probably would've been better
> if you had done it, but I assume Peter tested it, so let's see what
> the BF thinks.

skink and lousyjack seem happy now, so I think it worked.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Daniel Gustafsson 2018-02-08 12:50:22 Re: SSL test names
Previous Message Stas Kelvich 2018-02-08 12:43:23 Re: [HACKERS] logical decoding of two-phase transactions