From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> |
Cc: | David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Kevin Grittner <kgrittn(at)ymail(dot)com>, Nicolas Barbier <nicolas(dot)barbier(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Documentation/help for materialized and recursive views |
Date: | 2013-07-01 20:08:08 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYDgFEF=ByK4nkd4qD8FgT9KT056yWBWJTHd9PAu=jSRg@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Mon, Jul 1, 2013 at 3:57 PM, Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net> wrote:
> How different are they really? Yes, they are very different from an
> implementation standpoint, from an enduser perspective they really are
> not. If they were, they'd probably be called something else.
They're different because they consume storage, require effort to
update, and aren't always up-to-date. Those things are all quite
user-visible.
> I still think a better option to that would be to get psql to provide
> a link to the full documentation there.
It seems like clutter to me, but I'll defer to whatever the consensus is.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2013-07-01 20:10:23 | Re: Documentation/help for materialized and recursive views |
Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2013-07-01 20:05:21 | Re: Eliminating PD_ALL_VISIBLE, take 2 |