| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> | 
|---|---|
| To: | Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> | 
| Cc: | Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org>, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> | 
| Subject: | Re: Entities created in one query not available in another in extended protocol | 
| Date: | 2015-06-11 14:34:15 | 
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYDTapay1w_0hwoES1+UhZ-QoH5fSGhih_H=vHTJwdiBQ@mail.gmail.com | 
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email | 
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers | 
On Thu, Jun 11, 2015 at 5:38 AM, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> On 11 June 2015 at 11:20, Shay Rojansky <roji(at)roji(dot)org> wrote:
>>
>> In Npgsql, the .NET driver for PostgreSQL, we've switched from simple to
>> extended protocol and have received a user complaint.
>>
>> It appears that when we send two messages in an extended protocol (so two
>> Parse/Bind/Execute followed by a single Sync), where the first one creates
>> some entity (function, table), and the second one can't query that entity
>> (not found). This isn't terribly important but does seem a bit odd, I wanted
>> to make sure you're aware of this.
>
> Sounds somewhat unlikely, but thank you for the report. Can we see a test
> case?
Actually, I think I've seen this before.   The code that handles the
Sync message does this:
                        case 'S':                       /* sync */
                                pq_getmsgend(&input_message);
                                finish_xact_command();
                                send_ready_for_query = true;
                                break;
finish_xact_command() calls CommitTransactionCommand(), which does
CommandCounterIncrement() or CommitTransaction() as appropriate.  So
without the Sync, I think it's expected that you don't see the results
of the previous command.
-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Kohei KaiGai | 2015-06-11 14:40:03 | Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed | 
| Previous Message | Tomas Vondra | 2015-06-11 14:33:17 | Re: DBT-3 with SF=20 got failed |