Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Kyotaro HORIGUCHI <horiguchi(dot)kyotaro(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Cc: Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: default range partition and constraint exclusion
Date: 2017-11-28 15:52:10
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYC1k39LBLkEjfjsuw9W+Yd4nJBk8X+c_Xy3dFZ1bXEnA@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:01 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> I am out of time for today but will try to look at this some more tomorrow.

Upon closer study this seems to definitely be a correct fix, so I have
committed it. Apologies for my earlier confusion.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Peter Eisentraut 2017-11-28 16:04:38 Re: Allowing SSL connection of v11 client to v10 server with SCRAM channel binding
Previous Message Rady, Doug 2017-11-28 15:38:43 PATCH: pgbench - option to build using ppoll() for larger connection counts