From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
---|---|
To: | Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> |
Cc: | Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>, Mark Dilger <hornschnorter(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: Event triggers + table partitioning cause server crash in current master |
Date: | 2017-05-19 19:04:42 |
Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYBn9GgFNz397a-84b0iBdh27y80K-25MT8-CjkPc6ZOw@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Wed, May 17, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> [Action required within three days. This is a generic notification.]
>
> The above-described topic is currently a PostgreSQL 10 open item. Robert,
> since you committed the patch believed to have created it, you own this open
> item. If some other commit is more relevant or if this does not belong as a
> v10 open item, please let us know. Otherwise, please observe the policy on
> open item ownership[1] and send a status update within three calendar days of
> this message. Include a date for your subsequent status update. Testers may
> discover new open items at any time, and I want to plan to get them all fixed
> well in advance of shipping v10. Consequently, I will appreciate your efforts
> toward speedy resolution. Thanks.
I believe that the originally-reported crash has been fixed by
3ec76ff1f2cf52e9b900349957b42d28128b7bc7.
I have pushed ac8d7e1b834e252c9aa8d5750f70a86ca74228b8 to fix the
other issue which Amit spotted.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Peter Eisentraut | 2017-05-19 19:12:32 | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |
Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2017-05-19 18:54:54 | Re: Preliminary results for proposed new pgindent implementation |