Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com>
Cc: Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com>, Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>, Nathan Bossart <nathandbossart(at)gmail(dot)com>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: allowing for control over SET ROLE
Date: 2023-01-16 15:41:44
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYBeYRy3SrcP7r5xCue-N0mekLjuXKTreymtAompo4VKw@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Fri, Jan 13, 2023 at 2:17 AM Noah Misch <noah(at)leadboat(dot)com> wrote:
> Since the text is superfluous but not wrong, I won't insist.

OK, committed as I had it, then.

To me, the text isn't superfluous, because otherwise the connection to
what has been said in the previous sentence seems tenuous, which
impacts understandability. We'll see what other people think, I guess.
Perhaps there's some altogether better way to talk about this.

--
Robert Haas
EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2023-01-16 15:49:34 Re: pgsql: Add new GUC createrole_self_grant.
Previous Message David G. Johnston 2023-01-16 15:33:48 Re: pgsql: Add new GUC createrole_self_grant.