| From: | Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: beta3? |
| Date: | 2011-07-05 13:56:34 |
| Message-ID: | CA+TgmoYBW-atpRiAueigUpbK07WReFJUN73_jOi3U=xZ_8ODmA@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
On Fri, Jul 1, 2011 at 6:06 PM, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com> wrote:
>> That sounds reasonable to me. I'll be on vacation then, but (1) I'm
>> not really involved in pushing the release out the door and (2) I
>> should have Internet access if push comes to shove.
>
> We seem to still have some blockers ...
I'm only seeing these two:
* ALTER TABLE lock strength reduction patch is unsafe
* btree_gist breaks some behaviors involving <> operators
Simon fixed the first over the weekend (though I think there are a few
loose ends, see separate email on that topic) and Tom proposed a fix
for the second (which I am guessing he will implement).
Any other reason we can't or shouldn't wrap on the 11th?
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-05 14:00:49 | Re: Small documentation issue |
| Previous Message | Robert Haas | 2011-07-05 13:24:31 | Re: Crash dumps |