Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5

From: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>
Subject: Re: [9.4 CF 1] And then there were 5
Date: 2013-07-23 13:06:13
Message-ID: CA+TgmoYBRKjTV52RafDZSGfy2u_0rOaLsvEYgAzj_b4kMWQ11A@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 12:04 AM, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com> wrote:
> A further look at recently ALTER OPERATOR FAMILY changes shows that Robert
> has been working on those quite a bit. I'm putting him down as the
> committer on this last one.

I missed that one, now committed. But just BTW, you kind of messed up
that CommitFest entry. The link you added as a new version of the
patch was actually to a different patch from the same flock.

--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Greg Stark 2013-07-23 13:17:13 Re: Suggestion for concurrent index creation using a single full scan operation
Previous Message Bruce Momjian 2013-07-23 13:04:41 Re: pg_upgrade across more than two neighboring major releases